Quick Hits

-I just realized something about Lebron James bringing his talent to South Beach. It took me a few weeks to see this, but I think it's quite obvious. Lebron brought the Cavaliers gameplan along with him.

Lebron has never been a guy that has played with a pointguard. It's always been him and get the hell out of my way. The Cleveland Cavaliers were built specifically for Lebron's game. They had a bunch of role players who could hit spot-up jumpers. The Lebron Cavs always had one guy, and one guy only, who could create shots on his own. The Miami Heat aren't built that way. The have three Alpha Dogs who can create at anytime on their own. The problem is that the three of them haven't compromised and found a way to play together. Lebron is trying to get them to adapt to his style. The quicker the Heat get these guys playing to complement each other then the quicker they can get thru those growing pains and play the way we think they can.

They're heading down the wrong path right now and they need to reverse this trend and start to head down the right path. Lebron needs to learn to play with his new teammates and stop treating them like they're the Cavs.

-I'm convinced that Marvin Lewis would have been fired this week if they weren't playing Thanksgiving night. Marvin has had long enough to imprint his style on this team and organization, but it just isn't working. I'm tired of Marvin. This hurts to say this but the Bengals need to start over. Bring in Holmgren and let's rebuild this thing. I love Chad but he has to go. I hope the owner cares enough to see that this is going nowhere fast and his team has given up on a once promising head-coach.

-The Pats-Colts played another great regular season game. This turned into one of the great rivalries in the history of the game. We'll miss this matchup in five years when these QB's are gone or are no longer at the top of their games. The only other rivalry that might be close is New England-Pittsburgh. There's really nothing in the NFC that comes close.

-I think Melo gets traded in the next month or so. In fact, I think that whole team gets blown up. Chauncey might end up with a possible contender. As far as Melo, just put the guy out of his misery and trade him to New York. He wants to go play Amare and have a coach that doesn't care if he shows up on the defensive end.

-I think Coach Rick has convinced his team that they aren't good enough to win on talent alone. This team is playing harder than they have in quite some time. Tyson Chandler is a beast in the middle. I saw him get in Marion's grill on a defensive lapse. That's exactly what this team needs.

Tiger's new swing

I checked out a bit of the King Bhumibol (that might be right) Skins game the other nite. Let me just say that I haven't seen Tiger swing the club since the Ryder Cup over a month ago. Wow. His power is back.

Tiger seems to be gaining a huge amount of confidence in his new swing. There are some who will classify the Sean Foley swing as Stack & Tilt. There are certainly some similarities. This is what I think is the difference. Traditional Stack & Tilt gives your swing a certain style. Almost all Stack & Tilt players swing a certain way. It's very recognizable. I think Sean Foley allows his players to add their style to Stack & Tilt. None of the Foley players swing the same way, but they all have characteristics in their swings that are similar.

But back to Tiger. I saw some changes in his swing that were impressive. He seems to be much more on top of the ball going back. This leads to a stronger position at the top. His shift to his left side and release thru the ball are nite and day from four months ago. There wasn't a semblance of him getting stuck on they way down and thru. He was hitting driver on holes where he didn't need driver and he looked confident. He made a bad swing and the ball was about three yards off the fairway.

Tiger was always dominate when he could hit it out there with the long hitters. He toned it down the last few years and tried to become a control player with numerous shots in his bag. What if Tiger can become a hybrid of the two players he used to be? What if he can combine his raw power with a bit more accuracy and the ability to shape shots?

I don't know what 2011 holds for Tiger. A lot of it will depend on his putting. He'll play one more time this year at Chevron and then we won't see him until probably February. I wonder what that swing will look like then.

It's time for this to go

Well, it finally happened. Tiger lost his world number one ranking this past week. The new number one is Lee Westwood. It got me thinking about these rankings. Do we really need them?

Who do the world rankings benefit? I guess the players feel some sense of pride by being a highly ranked player. Maybe sponsors can gloat that they have ten of the top thirty players in the world at their tournament. But, seriously, does anyone know who the 30th ranked player in the world is. Does anyone care? Westwood proved that you don't even have to win that frequently to overtake the spot. Just be in contention a lot and that's good enough.

Golf is all about name recognition. There are certain names that you just know. Tiger, Phil, Ernie, and Vijay to name a few. These guys are noticed because of who they are and what they've done. We don't need a ranking system to verify that. We didn't have a world ranking system before 1985 and things got along just fine.

Also, I think the rankings might affect a guys play. Fred Couples never looked comfortable when he was tabbed as the worlds #1. David Duval carries around the distinction of a player who has fallen so far from his #1 ranking. Does he really need to answer questions about that? Phil Mickelson has fallen flat on his face in weeks where he could have overtaken the spot had he played slightly above average.

The best players in the game are always judged by how many majors they win. It's that simple.

I know we need some sort of ranking system in order to know who to invite to these big tournaments. It just seems that these rankings adds more of a drama than their really needs to be.

A new #1?

I like Lee Westwood. He's a great player and by all accounts he's a nice guy. He's had five top 3 finishes in his last eleven majors. He was sidelined at the PGA for a calf injury but came back for the Ryder Cup and played well. I read today that he will more than likely become the #1 player in the world on October 31st.

I'm not sure how I feel about this. Couples and Duval are the only other players to be #1 without having a major championship. Couples won his next major at the '92 Masters. Duval didn't get his major for almost two full years after becoming #1. But Duval was clearly the best player in the world in late '98 and early '99. Duval won two tournaments late in '98 and won four tournaments before the Masters in '99. He was on fire. Is Westwood on fire?

Westwood is essentially going to be #1 in the world due to being in the hunt so much lately. He won at St. Jude earlier this year, but he doesn't have a career defining win. No Players, Memorial, Bay Hill, WGC or any other big event. He lost the 54-hole lead at the Masters and hasn't played for two months before this week. But he will somehow be #1 in the world in a few weeks because he's been in contention lately. I think you need to win big in order to be #1. I hope Lee can justify this ranking or he won't have it long.

Other thoughts

I think this event means something to the Americans. I'm tired of hearing it doesn't. Steve Stricker almost cried on t.v. in front of Roger Maltbie. That guy cares. Hunter Mahan had a hard time in front of the press afterward. Tiger's record is 6-2-1 in his last two Ryder Cups. These guys care. Now, they may not care as much as the Euro's.

Here's a question I'd like to propose to the every member of the European tour. You can win five majors and be one of the best players in the world and lose every Ryder Cup for the next twenty years or you can have an average career and win every Ryder Cup for the next twenty years. I'm betting at least 90% will take the Ryder Cup wins. I bet the number is around 50% if you ask the American players the same question. Maybe even less than that.

A Ryder Cup win makes a European tour players career complete. A Ryder Cup win is a nice footnote for an American player. It's been the biggest tournament on the European tour schedule for thirty years. It's been about the tenth biggest tournament on the PGA Tour schedule for twenty years.

I also think that's part of the reason Monty didn't take Casey and Rose as picks. They play the U.S. tour and not the European tour. That makes qualifying for the Ryder Cup more difficult for those players and maybe that means it doesn't mean as much to them.

This tournament is the European tours Superbowl. It might be our NFC Wildcard game. It's hard to blame our players. There are so many big tournaments.

Maybe that's why we have success in the President's Cup. Those players on the international squad play the PGA Tour. They are exposed to the same conditions as the American players.

I guarantee you that the European papers will be talking about captaincy for 2012 in the next few weeks. That's something that won't cross the American minds for quite some time.

I hope this isn't true but I think it might be. This might be the last Ryder Cup that Seve Ballesteros sees. I keep reading that he is gravely ill. The man epitomizes European golf and the Ryder Cup. The event may not be what it is today without him and what he did in the 80's to fuel this event.

Two years until Medinah.

They made it really exciting.

If you told Corey Pavin, after the format change, that his team will win three of the four sessions, I think he'd that that. He just wouldn't think that he would lose the other session by five points. If we've learned anything about the Ryder Cup is that it's a big putting contest.

On Sunday, the U.S. team lipped out putts while the Euro's lipped in putts. The Euro's hit crucial putts when they needed and the U.S. didn't. It really is that simple.

Steve Stricker: Stricker's game got better as the week went on. He carried Tiger for two days and played a near flawless singles match against Europe's #1. A-(3-1)

Tiger Woods: He seemed to fill in the blanks on holes where Stricker didn't have it. Woods wasn't great but he didn't play poorly by any means. He played like Tiger in singles. B+(3-1)

Hunter Mahan: Played a solid foursome match in session two but leaked some oil in session three. He was put in an impossible position in singles and just couldn't pull it off. This was not his fault. B-(1-2)

Jeff Overton: What a surprise this was. Overton played with more emotion than anyone else on the team. You can tell he thrives in this environment. He carried Bubba around for two days and often played holes two against his one. A (2-2)

Phil Mickelson: Phil didn't have his long game or his putter for the first three sessions. He really played poorly and cost this team. He played well in singles but it wasn't good enough. He needs to take a lot of the blame for this one. C-(1-3)

Dustin Johnson: DJ hit the ball good all four sessions but couldn't buy a putt until singles. He was clearly outmatched on the greens. This should be the first of many Ryder Cups for Johnson and hopefully he remembers this feeling. C (1-3)

Jim Furyk: Furyk does not have a great Ryder Cup record but that is not entirely all on him. He looked tired this week. He didn't play well in session three with Johnson and got behind early in singles. He looked like he had Donald on more than a few occasions only to see Donald hole a twenty-footer. Going for the pin on 18 in singles, he pushed his third shot into the bunker. C (0-2-1)

Rickie Fowler: He made a horrible mistake in session two, only to battle back and get a halve in the end. He and Mickelson played poorly together in session three but his singles comeback will go down in history. His four birdie finish to tie Molinari was brilliant. That's why Pavin chose him and this is probably the first of many Cups to come. B-(0-1-2)

Matt Kuchar: Kuchar paired well with Stewart Cink but really didn't get going until session two. He looked tired from a long season trying to win the FedEx Cup. He started to hole a few putts and played some brilliant iron shots at times. B-(1-1-2)

Stewart Cink: Cink holed a crucial putt at the end of session two to give the U.S. a feeling that this might actually happen. He and Kuchar managed a half-point in session three for the U.S. but he didn't have the magic in singles. A three-putt on 15 cost him as well as a five-foot miss on 17. He managed a halve in singles but he will think what could have been. A deserved captains pick. B+(1-0-3)

Bubba Watson: By far the worst U.S. player. Watson was carried by Overton in session one. He constantly left crucial putts short and contributed little. He played Jimenez in singles and got waxed for Jimenez first career singles win. This is where the format change hurt the Americans. Pavin may have sat Watson if it wasn't for the rain. A disappointing effort. F (1-3)

Zack Johnson: Zack was tough. He had a tough session three but he isn't afraid to hole crucial putts. He drives it in the fairway, hits a ton of greens, and makes the putts when they count. He has the perfect game for Ryder Cup competition. B+ (2-1)

It was really nice to see the U.S. rally and make the Euro's sweat. In the end, it was the best Ryder Cup since Kiawah Island in 1991. The U.S. should be proud of how they played. I felt disgusted in '02, '04, and '06. It came down to the last singles match. You can't ask for anything more.

Who's going to run through that wall?

I remember when Ben Crenshaw chose Steve Pate as a captains pick in the 1999 Ryder Cup. His reasoning is that Pate would run through a brick wall for the team. That team was full of brick wall guys: Pate, Sutton, Lehman, Stewart. I always liked guys like that. Lanny Wadkins was the ultimate run through a brick wall guy. What's the definition of a brick wall guy? He's a guy who will go out and get a point no matter what the circumstances. He's the type of guy that will scratch and claw his way to a point and the kind of guy the other team hates seeing on the first tee.

Every good Ryder Cup team has those guys. I'm looking at this roster and thinking "is Rickie Fowler this teams brick wall guy?" Damn, but lets look at the team.

Tiger Woods: I guess Tiger can be a brick wall guy but it seems like he might ask what his appearance fee on the other side of the wall is.

Phil Mickelson: I've never thought of Phil that way. It seems like he would ask what his insurance policy would cover just in case.

Stewart Cink, Matt Kuchar, Steve Stricker: Seems like they wouldn't want to hurt the wall.

Hunter Mahan: Strikes me as the guy who wouldn't want to mess his shoes up.

Jeff Overton: I think Overton would run through the wall but I think it might be an accident.

Bubba Watson, Dustin Johnson: Like everything else, they might ask if they can go over it.

Zack Johnson, Jim Furyk: They would go through the wall but they might feel bad and put the wall back together.

And that leaves Rickie Fowler. Who knows what he'll bring but he looks like a young Sergio Garcia to me. Sergio had more emotion and game at that '99 Ryder Cup than anyone out there. Corey Pavin was a brick wall player. He knew how to get that ball in the hole when it mattered most. I think Pavin sees a bit of himself in Fowler. I hope I'm wrong about these guys. I take a Ryder Cup loss as hard as anyone. Nothing would be better than going across the pond and getting this one.